But she says, he gotta do the other aspect 1st.” (BPC: he’s gotta do) Control participant: “it has my size” (BPC: it is actually my size)Brain Sci. 2013, 3 Table 5. Cont.Significant Violations of Correlative Conjunction Constraints H.M.: “I … she wants the residence painted precisely the same as him and he wants to mow the lawn.” (BPC 1: as he does; or BPC 2: as his home) H.M.: “Yes. Mainly because it is wrong for her to be and he’s OPC-8212 web dressed just as this that he’s dressed plus the same way–(Exp.: OK, excellent) as her.” (BPC: he’s dressed just as this man is dressed) H.M.: “Once must be trash in yellow (inaudible) … isn’t right here. (H.M. misread the target word nor as not) (Exp.: It says nor) She does not want her pie.” [H.M. failed to work with nor as requested] H.M.: “I want a number of that pie either some pie and I will have some.” (misuse of either) H.M.: “Any pie to either have.” (misuse of either) H.M.: “Any pie that either she either had.” (two misuses of either)BPCs are in parentheses, with numbers labeling option BPCs and a number of errors. Square brackets enclose an explanation for standard examples in every category.four.two.two. Precise Analyses: Gender, Quantity, and Particular person CCs As applied to the TLC, gender, quantity, and individual CCs refer to the fact that (a) right names, pronouns, typical nouns, and common noun NPs will have to agree in gender, number, and person with their referents within a image, and (b) pronouns ought to agree in gender, number, and particular person with their antecedents inside a sentence. four.two.two.1. Gender, Quantity, and Individual CCs for Suitable Name Referents H.M. produced seven right names versus a imply of 0.0 for the controls, a trusted 6.0 SD difference by convention. For these seven appropriate name makes use of, H.M. violated 0 referent-proper name CCs involving gender, versus a mean of 0.0 for the controls (with N = 0 and SD = 0). As an example, within the corresponding TLC images, H.M.’s suitable names Gary and David in (23ab) referred to males, and Melanie in (23c) referred to a female. (23a). H.M.: “Gary is … PubMed ID:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21338877 almos … almost … hasn’t been cut the identical way.” (Gary is definitely an invented right name that specifies an unknown man inside the TLC picture) (23b). H.M.: “David wanted him to fall and to find out what lady’s applying to pull himself up in addition to his hands.” (David is definitely an invented suitable name that specifies an unknown man within the TLC picture) (23c). H.M.: “Melanie gets on that one if she can and she wants her to travel along with him.” (Melanie is an invented proper name that specifies an unknown lady in the TLC image) Analyses of referent-proper name CCs for particular person and quantity replicated and extended these gender CC results: H.M. produced 0 violations of referent-proper name CCs for person (with N = 7), versus a mean of 0.0 for the controls (with N = 0 and SD = 0), and 0 violations of referent-proper name CCs for quantity (with N = 7), versus a imply of 0.0 for the controls (with N = 0 and SD = 0).Brain Sci. 2013, three 4.2.2.two. Gender, Number, and Person CCs for Pronouns and Frequent NounsH.M. violated 22 individual, number, and gender CCs involving pronouns and typical nouns, versus a mean of 0.0 for the controls (SD = 0), a reputable 6.0 SD distinction by convention. Of those, 14 were violations of gender CCs, as in (24). (24). H.M.: “…to view what lady’s utilizing to pull himself up apart from his hands.” (BPC: to see what this lady’s employing to pull herself up besides her hands; see Table 5 for H.M.’s complete utterance) (25). H.M.: “If they don’t use legs like he does…and his hands…” (BPC: If they don’t use their legs like.