He does … and their hands; see Table five for H.M.’s total utterance) (26). H.M.: “it just pointed out this bus is up right here.” (BPC determined by the image: she just pointed out this bus is up right here; see Table 5 for H.M.’s comprehensive utterance) (27). H.M.: “she desires her to travel together with him.” (BPC: she desires him to travel along with her or he wants her to travel along with him; see Table 5 for H.M.’s full utterance) Instance (24) contains two uncorrected CC violations involving the gender (male versus female) for pronoun antecedents: To agree in gender with their antecedent lady, H.M.’s pronouns himself and his in (24) ought to read herself and her. H.M.’s promptly subsequent Gynosaponin I utterance in (25) illustrates two further uncorrected CC violations involving pronoun-antecedent number (singular versus plural): To agree in number with their antecedent they, H.M.’s pronouns in (25) should really read they … use their legs … and their hands … When making use of pronouns to designate men and women in TLC photos (see Table five), H.M. also violated eight CCs involving the gender, quantity, and particular person for the referents of pronouns, versus a imply of 0.0 for the controls (SD = 0), a reputable six.0 SD distinction by convention. For instance, H.M.’s “it just pointed out” in (26) violates a pronoun-referent CC for particular person since the pronoun it can be inappropriate for referring to people today. H.M. then developed two related CC violations involving pronoun-referent gender in (27), his instantly subsequent utterance: Mainly because a man as well as a woman (conversing in the image) are the only possible referents for H.M.’s “she”, (27) really should read either she wants him to travel in conjunction with her or he desires her to travel as well as him. 4.two.2.three. CCs Involving Popular Noun NPs (28). H.M.: “it’s crowded college bus.” (BPC: it really is a crowded college bus; violation of a determiner-common noun CC; see Table four for H.M.’s complete utterance) (29). H.M.: “and the fresh are not- are usually not…” (BPC determined by TLC image: the fresh fruit are not…; major violation of a modifier-common noun CC; see Table four for H.M.’s comprehensive utterance) Analyses of CC violations involving frequent noun NPs had been relevant towards the possibility that H.M. applied suitable names (e.g., Gary) to compensate for difficulties in forming functionally equivalent NPs (e.g., this man), although appropriate name usage permitted no related CC violations. H.M. developed 9 significant omission-type CC violations involving determiner- and modifier-common noun NPs, versus a imply of 0.25 for the controls (SD = 0.53), a trusted 16.5 SD distinction (see Tables four and 5). ForBrain Sci. 2013,example, (28) illustrates an omission-type CC violation in a determiner-common noun NP: H.M.’s uncorrected “it’s crowded school bus” (for BPC a crowded school bus) reflects omission from the determiner a. Similarly, (29) illustrates an omission-type CC violation involving a modifier-common noun NP: H.M.’s uncorrected “the fresh are not” (for BPC the fresh fruit PubMed ID:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21337810 are usually not) is ungrammatical for the reason that adjectives such as fresh demand a noun which include fruit to finish the NP. 4.3. Subsidiary Outcomes 4.three.1. H.M.’s TLC Right Names: Retrieved or Invented Why did H.M. opt for 1 proper name rather than one more to refer to the unknown people in TLC photos A single possibility is that prior to his lesion H.M. had already formed the acceptable referent-proper name links for referring to these TLC persons simply because they reminded him of pre-lesion acquaintances. Under this hypothesis H.M. could hence retrieve t.