Ing occurred at loss-to-follow up, elective withdrawal from the dialysis program or Anlotinib web kidney transplantation, whichever occurred first. Univariate Cox proportional regression analysis was performed to determine the association between baseline Nutlin (3a)MedChemExpress Nutlin (3a) characteristics and all-cause and cause-specific mortalities (CV and infection-related mortalities). Variables with p<0.25 on univariate cox regression analysis were entered into the multivariable Cox regression to determine the baseline predictor(s) of all-cause mortality. Survival analysis was based on an intention-to-treat analysis hence modality switches during the study period were not taken into account. In assessing cause-specific mortalities, a cumulative incidence competing-risk analysis was utilized.[12] Missing data points on assessed covariates were adjudged to be missing at random and were subsequently multiply imputed. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistical significant.ResultsTable 1 summarises the baseline features of all the patients in this study. The average age was 36.1?1.9 years, with a slight preponderance of male patients (52.1 ). The majority of patientsTable 1. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of patients according to modality. Baseline Characteristic Age at start of dialysis (Years) Gender (Male / Female) ( ) Race: ( ) - Blacks - Whites - Others** Predominant area of dwelling [rural locale] ( ) Type of housing [Formal] Distance to Dialysis unit (km) BMI (kg/m2) eGFR [MDRD] (mls/min) SBP (mmHg) DBP (mmHg) Cause of ESRD: ( ) - Diabetes - Hypertension - Glomerulonephritis - Unknown - Others*** Duration of follow up * P < 0.05 **Others--Mixed ancestry, Indians and Asians ***Others--Unknown causes, Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease, Obstructive uropathy, chronic interstitial Nephritis#All Patients (n = 340) 36.1 ?11.9 52.1/47.9 92.9 5.0 2.1 87.5 67.6 112.3 ?73.4 23.9 ?5.5 7.1 ?3.7 140.1 ?27.1 84.6 ?17.7 10.3 25.9 6.8 45.0 12.0 36.6 ?25.HD patients (n = 194) 43.3 ?12.0 47.4/52.6 93.8 4.6 1.6 85.2 67.6 110.7 ?75.9 23.6 ?5.0 7.0 ?0.1 141.5 ?26.3 84.4 ?16.8 11.3 22.7 8.3 45.4 12.3 43.3 ?26.CAPD patient (n = 146) 35.3 ?11.5 51.4/48.6 91.8 5.5 2.7 90.7 80.7 114.3 ?70.2 24.3 ?6.3 7.3 ?0.1 137.9 ?28.1 84.8 ?19.0 8.9 30.1 4.8 44.5 11.7 27 ?21.p-value 0.35 0.83 0.0.13 0.01* 0.66 0.37 0.11 0.25 0.87 0.<0.001*#Wilcoxon rank sum testdoi:10.1371/journal.pone.0156642.tPLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0156642 June 14,4 /Baseline Predictors of Mortality in Chronic Dialysis Patients in Limpopo, South Africa(92.9 ) were of black African ancestry while, in keeping with the geo-demography of Limpopo, many of the patients (87.5 ) were rural dwellers. The average distance travelled from patients' homes to the dialysis centre was 112.3 ?73.4km. Approximately 60.0 of the patients were treated with HD (Table 1). As a result of late presentation, the cause of ESRD remained unknown in 45.0 while hypertension, diabetes mellitus and glomerulonephritis accounted for 25.9 , 10.3 and 6.8 respectively of all dialyzed patients. There was no difference in eGFR at dialysis initiation between HD and CAPD patients. Six (3.1 ) of the patients on HD were positive for the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) while there were no HIV positive patients on CAPD. Only 4 patients (1.1 ) received kidney transplants (living donors) during the period of follow up. Other clinical characteristics of the patients are shown in Table 1. Differences between HD and CAPD patients with respect to ba.Ing occurred at loss-to-follow up, elective withdrawal from the dialysis program or kidney transplantation, whichever occurred first. Univariate Cox proportional regression analysis was performed to determine the association between baseline characteristics and all-cause and cause-specific mortalities (CV and infection-related mortalities). Variables with p<0.25 on univariate cox regression analysis were entered into the multivariable Cox regression to determine the baseline predictor(s) of all-cause mortality. Survival analysis was based on an intention-to-treat analysis hence modality switches during the study period were not taken into account. In assessing cause-specific mortalities, a cumulative incidence competing-risk analysis was utilized.[12] Missing data points on assessed covariates were adjudged to be missing at random and were subsequently multiply imputed. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistical significant.ResultsTable 1 summarises the baseline features of all the patients in this study. The average age was 36.1?1.9 years, with a slight preponderance of male patients (52.1 ). The majority of patientsTable 1. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of patients according to modality. Baseline Characteristic Age at start of dialysis (Years) Gender (Male / Female) ( ) Race: ( ) - Blacks - Whites - Others** Predominant area of dwelling [rural locale] ( ) Type of housing [Formal] Distance to Dialysis unit (km) BMI (kg/m2) eGFR [MDRD] (mls/min) SBP (mmHg) DBP (mmHg) Cause of ESRD: ( ) - Diabetes - Hypertension - Glomerulonephritis - Unknown - Others*** Duration of follow up * P < 0.05 **Others--Mixed ancestry, Indians and Asians ***Others--Unknown causes, Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease, Obstructive uropathy, chronic interstitial Nephritis#All Patients (n = 340) 36.1 ?11.9 52.1/47.9 92.9 5.0 2.1 87.5 67.6 112.3 ?73.4 23.9 ?5.5 7.1 ?3.7 140.1 ?27.1 84.6 ?17.7 10.3 25.9 6.8 45.0 12.0 36.6 ?25.HD patients (n = 194) 43.3 ?12.0 47.4/52.6 93.8 4.6 1.6 85.2 67.6 110.7 ?75.9 23.6 ?5.0 7.0 ?0.1 141.5 ?26.3 84.4 ?16.8 11.3 22.7 8.3 45.4 12.3 43.3 ?26.CAPD patient (n = 146) 35.3 ?11.5 51.4/48.6 91.8 5.5 2.7 90.7 80.7 114.3 ?70.2 24.3 ?6.3 7.3 ?0.1 137.9 ?28.1 84.8 ?19.0 8.9 30.1 4.8 44.5 11.7 27 ?21.p-value 0.35 0.83 0.0.13 0.01* 0.66 0.37 0.11 0.25 0.87 0.<0.001*#Wilcoxon rank sum testdoi:10.1371/journal.pone.0156642.tPLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0156642 June 14,4 /Baseline Predictors of Mortality in Chronic Dialysis Patients in Limpopo, South Africa(92.9 ) were of black African ancestry while, in keeping with the geo-demography of Limpopo, many of the patients (87.5 ) were rural dwellers. The average distance travelled from patients' homes to the dialysis centre was 112.3 ?73.4km. Approximately 60.0 of the patients were treated with HD (Table 1). As a result of late presentation, the cause of ESRD remained unknown in 45.0 while hypertension, diabetes mellitus and glomerulonephritis accounted for 25.9 , 10.3 and 6.8 respectively of all dialyzed patients. There was no difference in eGFR at dialysis initiation between HD and CAPD patients. Six (3.1 ) of the patients on HD were positive for the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) while there were no HIV positive patients on CAPD. Only 4 patients (1.1 ) received kidney transplants (living donors) during the period of follow up. Other clinical characteristics of the patients are shown in Table 1. Differences between HD and CAPD patients with respect to ba.