Essing health services for Latinos in the US16 but did not co-occur with our HIV stigma themes. It is possible that, given our very small subsets of Latino participants, we were not able to capture these data with the interview guide questions we asked. Another study limitation has to do with generalizeability. HIV stigma demonstrated in these communities in rural North Carolina may be comparable to HIV stigma in other southeastern communities, but this cannot be assumed from these findings. It does appear, however, that HIV stigma in rural North Carolina may be higher than what is reported in US metropolitan areas, particularly for men who have sex with men.17 Furthermore, we found that the pervasiveness of HIV stigma is uncannily similar to that reported in China or other relatively resource-poor countries/regions in the world.9,18?0 Future Zebularine custom synthesis Research is warranted to apply our conceptual model to other demographically similar rural US communities, as well as distinctly different communities in the US and other nations as a way to increase the external validity of the HIV stigma themes identified in this study. HIV stigma continues to be a daunting challenge in US rural communities that seek to bridge the gap in health disparities and access to care, including making HIV clinical trials accessible. Nevertheless, our study findings suggest that efforts to address HIV stigma in rural US settings may be crucial if health disparities are to be addressed. The conceptual model developed will be useful for planning, developing, and implementing HIV stigma reduction interventions at the community and individual levels.NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author ManuscriptAcknowledgmentsDr. Sengupta led the team that analyzed the data. The team included Dr. Miles, Dr. Roman-Isler, and Ms. Banks. In addition, we would like to acknowledge Michelle Hayes, Joiaisha Bland, and Jeffery Edwards for their contributions to data collection and data analysis. Funding: This study was funded by the National Institute of Nursing Research, Grant # R01NR010204-01A2; UNC GCRC, Grant # RR00046; and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Grant # K01AI055247-05.N C Med J. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2011 February 11.Sengupta et al.Page
NIH Public AccessAuthor ManuscriptJ Pers Assess. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2011 February 21.Published in final edited form as: J Pers Assess. 2010 July ; 92(4): 306?16. doi:10.1080/00223891.2010.481986.NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author ManuscriptAssessing Dependency using Self-report and Indirect Measures: Examining the Significance of DiscrepanciesAlex Cogswell Peretinoin web University at Buffalo Lauren B. Alloy, Andrew Karpinski, and David Grant Temple UniversityAbstractThe present study addressed convergence between self-report and indirect approaches to assessing dependency. The study was moderately successful in validating an implicit measure, which was found to be reliable, orthogonal to two self-report instruments, and predictive of external criteria. This study also examined discrepancies between scores on self-report and implicit measures, and has implications for their significance. The possibility that discrepancies themselves are pathological was not supported, although discrepancies were associated with particular personality profiles. Finally, this study offered additional evidence for the relation between dependency and depressive symptomatology, and i.Essing health services for Latinos in the US16 but did not co-occur with our HIV stigma themes. It is possible that, given our very small subsets of Latino participants, we were not able to capture these data with the interview guide questions we asked. Another study limitation has to do with generalizeability. HIV stigma demonstrated in these communities in rural North Carolina may be comparable to HIV stigma in other southeastern communities, but this cannot be assumed from these findings. It does appear, however, that HIV stigma in rural North Carolina may be higher than what is reported in US metropolitan areas, particularly for men who have sex with men.17 Furthermore, we found that the pervasiveness of HIV stigma is uncannily similar to that reported in China or other relatively resource-poor countries/regions in the world.9,18?0 Future research is warranted to apply our conceptual model to other demographically similar rural US communities, as well as distinctly different communities in the US and other nations as a way to increase the external validity of the HIV stigma themes identified in this study. HIV stigma continues to be a daunting challenge in US rural communities that seek to bridge the gap in health disparities and access to care, including making HIV clinical trials accessible. Nevertheless, our study findings suggest that efforts to address HIV stigma in rural US settings may be crucial if health disparities are to be addressed. The conceptual model developed will be useful for planning, developing, and implementing HIV stigma reduction interventions at the community and individual levels.NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author ManuscriptAcknowledgmentsDr. Sengupta led the team that analyzed the data. The team included Dr. Miles, Dr. Roman-Isler, and Ms. Banks. In addition, we would like to acknowledge Michelle Hayes, Joiaisha Bland, and Jeffery Edwards for their contributions to data collection and data analysis. Funding: This study was funded by the National Institute of Nursing Research, Grant # R01NR010204-01A2; UNC GCRC, Grant # RR00046; and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Grant # K01AI055247-05.N C Med J. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2011 February 11.Sengupta et al.Page
NIH Public AccessAuthor ManuscriptJ Pers Assess. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2011 February 21.Published in final edited form as: J Pers Assess. 2010 July ; 92(4): 306?16. doi:10.1080/00223891.2010.481986.NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author ManuscriptAssessing Dependency using Self-report and Indirect Measures: Examining the Significance of DiscrepanciesAlex Cogswell University at Buffalo Lauren B. Alloy, Andrew Karpinski, and David Grant Temple UniversityAbstractThe present study addressed convergence between self-report and indirect approaches to assessing dependency. The study was moderately successful in validating an implicit measure, which was found to be reliable, orthogonal to two self-report instruments, and predictive of external criteria. This study also examined discrepancies between scores on self-report and implicit measures, and has implications for their significance. The possibility that discrepancies themselves are pathological was not supported, although discrepancies were associated with particular personality profiles. Finally, this study offered additional evidence for the relation between dependency and depressive symptomatology, and i.